Imagine a world where Walmart only has five stores left.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s unthinkable because the company has dominated retail for so long, and it survived the pivot from pure brick-and-mortar operations to an omnichannel retailer.<\/p>\n
Even if it sells explosive diarrhea lettuce, replaces its greeters with unsupervised raccoons, or puts the people behind Fyre Festival in charge of grocery pickup, the chain would suffer, but survive.<\/p>\n
Sears, arguably the chain that served as the Walmart of its day, did not make any single mistake quite as epic as any of the silly ones listed above. Instead, the chain, which was bigger than Walmart by sales until 1990, according to Business Insider<\/a>, made thousands of little mistakes.<\/p>\n The once-dominant retailer, founded in 1886, even survived the pivot from its catalog business to a store-based model.<\/p>\n Since 1990, however, the chain has slowly dwindled, selling off assets such as its Craftsman, DieHard, and Lands End brands and using the proceeds for ill-fated ideas that did not reverse the slide.<\/p>\n Now, while Sears has not shut down, the chain has five locations left and appears to have abandoned any realistic hopes of a comeback.<\/p>\n Sears actually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy<\/a> in 2018, according to court documents filed on PacerMonitor<\/a>.<\/p>\n At the time, Global Data Managing Director Neil Saunders released a strong statement<\/a> on the company.<\/p>\n \u201cToday is a day that will live in retail infamy. That a storied retailer, once at the pinnacle of the industry, should collapse in such a shabby state of disarray is both terrible and scandalous in equal measure. However, it is not surprising because this is a destination that Sears has been headed towards for many years, with virtually no serious attempt having ever been made to change the trajectory,” he wrote.<\/p>\n Saunders called on the company to make big changes and made it clear that its current strategies were not working.<\/p>\n \u201cOver the longer term it is still unclear what Sears hopes to accomplish. We believe there is no clear path to success. The group has tried to shrink its way to profitability for years to no avail, so it is hard to see why pursuing the same strategy under the auspice of Chapter 11 would result in a different outcome,” he added.<\/p>\n More Retail:<\/strong><\/p>\n He also foretold what would happen down the road with many of the company’s owned-and-operated brands, which had not yet been sold. <\/p>\n “Further asset sales may reduce debt, but they would not put the company on a sound financial footing nor would they solve the operating losses the group is racking up,” he shared.<\/p>\n Many analysts trace the true beginning of the chain’s downfall not to its Chapter 11 filing, but to its post-bankruptcy purchase by hedge fund<\/a> operator Eddie Lampert in 2004.<\/p>\n Lampert merged the company with KMart in 2005, which Saunders also saw as a problem. <\/p>\n \u201cThe solution to Sears\u2019 problems was to buy another retailer not doing well, and that was Kmart. Then they got a bigger bad business,\u201d Saunders told CNBC<\/a>. \u201cSears wasn\u2019t investing or changing, and they started to suffer because of that.\u201d<\/p>\n And while other retailers were investing, Sears was cutting back.<\/p>\n A report from Susquehanna Financial Group had said Sears in 2017 was spending roughly 91 cents per square foot to make upgrades both online and in stores, while J.C. Penney spent $4.13, Kohl\u2019s was paying $8.12, and Best Buy was forking out $15.36 per square foot to make enhancements, CNBC reported.<\/p>\n \u201cI think if it was any other retailer they probably would\u2019ve already filed for bankruptcy,\u201d Retail Metrics founder Ken Perkins told CNBC in 2018. \u201cBut in Sears\u2019 case, someone with deep pockets is able to influx cash, extract real estate and sell off assets \u2026 the cupboard is running very bare and there isn\u2019t a lot left.\u201d<\/p>\n At its peak, Sears operated more than 2,700 locations.<\/p>\n Sears did raise cash selling off its well-known brands.<\/p>\n Craftsman went to Stanley Black & Decker, which now sells it at Home Depot and other chains. DieHard was sold to Advance Auto Parts, and Lands’ End was spun off and still runs independently.<\/p>\n Some analysts have argued that Lampert’s only goal was to sell off Sears’ massive real estate holdings. Lampert also used those holdings to protect his investment in the company should it fail.<\/p>\n \u201cIf they go bankrupt, he remains in control of the company because, though he loses his equity stake, he\u2019s their principal creditor,\u201d former Sears Canada CEO and Columbia Business School Professor Mark Cohen told CNBC<\/a>. <\/p>\n But Lampert has cordoned \u201coff an enormous amount of assets through the loans he\u2019s made, which have essentially protected him from what is eventually (going to) occur,\u201d added Cohen.<\/p>\n Sears’ owner sold off hundreds of the chain’s properties to Seritage Growth Properties, a company he controls.<\/p>\n The problem is that \u201cthen you end up signing leases\u201d and saddling the company with lease liabilities, Neil Stern, senior partner at retail consulting firm McMillanDoolittle, told CNBC.<\/p>\n Shutterstock<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Sears creditors sued Lampert and other investors, a case which was ultimately settled.<\/p>\n “By the time it\u00a0filed for bankruptcy, many of Sears Holdings\u2019 stores had closed, major assets \u2014 including property, beloved products brands and retail banners such as Sears Canada \u2014 had been sold or spun off,” the legal website shared.<\/p>\n How those sales were conducted were the heart of the lawsuit against Lampert and other defendants. <\/p>\n “Lampert and his hedge fund, ESL Investments,\u00a0invested in and often took controlling stakes in many of the divested assets, including Sears Canada, Lands\u2019 End, and Seritage Growth Properties (which included a large portfolio of Sears Holdings\u2019 real estate),” the site reported.<\/p>\n Five Sears stores are still operating in the country, but they won\u2019t be around much longer, industry experts predict, The New York Times<\/a> reported.<\/p>\n “Neither will Seritage Growth Properties, the real estate investment trust created to cash in on the value of the retailer\u2019s properties. It abandoned its somewhat audacious plan to turn Sears\u2019 rich real estate holdings into dazzling mixed-use properties. Today, Seritage is offloading the last of its assets as it pays down a $1.6 billion term loan from Warren E. Buffett\u2019s Berkshire Hathaway,” the newspaper shared.<\/p>\n That process will end soon, which could mean the formal end of Sears as a retailer.<\/p>\n \u201cThe goal is to sell the remaining Seritage assets as quickly and profitably as possible, but we are also very open to an alternative transaction that could enhance shareholder value,\u201d Adam Metz, chief executive of Seritage, said in an interview with the paper.<\/p>\nSears Chapter 11 was the beginning of the end<\/h2>\n
\n
Sears was sold off for parts<\/h2>\n
Lampert was sued over Sears’ sales<\/h2>\n
\n
Sears has 5 locations left<\/h2>\n